AGC-Bench
Released model attempts and individual creativity judgments across the AGC-Bench component datasets.
- items
- 8,600items
- AI subjects
- 83AI subjects
The Measurement Data Bank is a curated exchange of item-level AI evaluation data: what each system was tested on, how it responded, and how each response was scored. Analyze those measurements with torch_measure.
Responses are scored by deterministic or programmatic verifiers and test harnesses.
Automated selected. 264 benchmarks available.
Released model attempts and individual creativity judgments across the AGC-Bench component datasets.
Released early per-error detection results for a Claude Opus 4.6 review workflow on six perturbed papers. Items contain the released paper text; grading criteria identify the injected errors. This is a partial experimental slice, not the full paper evaluation.
Recorded AI audits of honest and sabotaged machine-learning research codebases and their papers.
Released agent attempts at identifying individual scientific papers and collecting sets of relevant papers.
Recorded language-model attempts at German legal decision and case-solution tasks, with explicit grading protocols.
Published development-checkpoint guard classifications of recorded computer-use-agent trajectories.
Language-model agents manage a simulated startup; retain published outcomes and complete released trajectories.
Readability of educational answers from base, grade-prompted and grade-finetuned GPT models. Preserve the released DGPT answers and integrate their recorded readability estimates with the authors' classifier.
Recorded net income of language-model agents managing a coffee roaster in a 90-day multi-agent economy.
Released accuracy judgments for eight OpenClaw agents on 492 exploratory financial data-analysis tasks.
Released model transcriptions of 513 anonymized circuit-analysis homework samples and the available recognition-error judgments for six MLLMs.
Published per-task on-target verdicts for five ExploitGym agent submissions, retaining mitigation profiles and the additional two-hour result view.
Evaluates whether models can translate operations-research problems into executable optimization programs that produce feasible solutions.
Computer-use agent results on 135 synthetic healthcare-administration tasks, with original strict and process-check-removed judgments.
Evaluates factual recall across seven tiers of obscurity, using an LLM judge to distinguish correct answers, incorrect answers, and refusals.
Released OCaml course code-generation, program-repair and conceptual-question assessments.
End-to-end legal RAG benchmark: 100 Victorian criminal-law questions x (3 embedders x 2 frontier LLMs), judged on binary correctness, groundedness, and retrieval accuracy.
Published multiplayer Risk games with per-seat win/loss outcomes, recorded player configurations and full available interaction logs.
Published historical round-level Lean-verifier assessments for seven model labels on existing miniF2F and miniCTX tasks; this collection does not introduce a new task benchmark.
Published model attempts on ArXivMath, ArXivLean, BrokenArXiv and USAMO 2026, with original requests, full conversations and native grading scales.
Adaptive combinatorial-reasoning benchmark: constraint-satisfaction (CSP/SAT) decision problems with solver-verified SAT/UNSAT ground truth; 12 models evaluated with and without a sandboxed SAT/SMT solver.
Recorded rubric-level LLM judgments and original viewer traces from the 15 official MyPCBench showcase trajectories.
Published Match-SOTA outcomes for 23 coding-agent configurations on 90 scientific ML tasks, with complete available native run files and recorded validity judgments.
OpenBioRQ: 657-question core of unsolved biomedical research questions for tool-using agents, graded by a frozen per-question checklist; solve = checklist score >= 0.5. Full per-(model x item) matrix released for 11 agents (roster, held-out, frontier, no-tool ablations).
Published correctness-and-runnability assessments of generated code replacements for systems optimization tasks, with complete source inputs and native execution logs.
Published ProgramBench attempts to reconstruct executable behavior from a compiled program and its documentation, with native fractional behavioral-test scores and complete recorded agent trajectories.
Real-POCQi: blinded specialty-matched physician pairwise evaluation of clinical AI systems (GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Opus 4.8, OpenEvidence) on 620 real point-of-care queries, rated on five dimensions.
Recorded LLM classification of help-seeking and response-use in student–chatbot interaction segments.
Recorded autonomous scientific research attempts, graded against expert-weighted task rubrics.
Recorded mathematical reasoning and text-reconstruction attempts under deterministic prompt transformations.
Released model predictions for student-response assessment across the S-GRADES dataset families.
SketchJudge (arXiv 2601.06944): 16 multimodal LLMs act as graders of 1,015 hand-drawn student STEM answers (geometry, physics, chart, flowchart). response = binary grading accuracy, 1 iff the model's correctness verdict matches the expert gold label, under WithRef/NoRef settings and baseline/CoT/rubric prompt styles.
Coding LLMs predict a runtime test outcome (passed/failed/error) for 435 library-level cases derived from SWE-bench Verified; response is per-item outcome-prediction correctness.
Selected hybrid computer-use trajectories from the original WeaveBench gallery, with complete published task prompts, grading evidence and linked screenshots.
Evaluates tool-using agents on workplace tasks by comparing their final sandbox state with the expected outcome.
Abstract-Reason benchmark: rule-based symbolic reasoning tasks (basic/extended computation, non-decimal number bases, symbolic function inference, symbolic manipulation) with systematic symbol remapping to separate genuine abstraction from memorization.
Released math and code candidate solutions used for AdaptiveStep Best-of-N evaluation. The tables measure individual policy-generator attempts, not reward-model selection or token-guided decoding.
Assesses the safety of recorded Mistral responses using released annotations.
Item-level MMLU predictions released for AGI-Elo, a study of joint task difficulty and AI-system competency. This curation covers the released question-answering observations, not derived Elo ratings.
Evaluates coding agents on producing correct numerical programs that match or improve reference runtime.
Published judgments of alignment-faking reasoning across model organisms, interventions and reinforcement-learning checkpoints in Anthropic's training-time mitigation study.
Released final SQL queries from Alpha-SQL, a Monte Carlo tree-search system using Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, on the BIRD development questions.
Human evaluations of five GPT-4o prompting strategies for written corrective feedback on English-learner errors.
Released AIC CTU development predictions for image-text claim verification, measured by the upstream verdict-correctness component.
Released CAF-Score caption-pair decisions on BRACE audio: correctness of smoothed and raw score variants against the annotations actually used in the third-party evaluation.
Cell-type annotation from verbalized single-cell gene expression. This curation covers the released DeepSeek-R1 results for the 748 multiple-sclerosis scRNA-seq questions.
Chart question answering with the 162 released Claude 3.7 Sonnet development outputs and their original images.
Published circuit-level placement and synthesis measurements, full released design kits and native metric scales.
ConfAgents medical multiple-choice diagnosis: per-(agent, question) binary correctness (1 = final answer matches the gold option) on a released 16-question subset (8 MedBullets + 8 MedQA) answered by four agent frameworks (ConfAgents, ColaCare, MDAgents, MedAgent).
Released Lighteval observations for the Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct baseline and a CDG-trained checkpoint on GSM8K and MATH-500.
Released clinical answers and LLM assessments from the main, prompt-optimization and repeated-generation experiments.
C-SEO Bench measures changes in document citation ranking in conversational search. Each item is a paired Original/intervention prompt with one target document; each response is that document's rank improvement for one released model. The release spans books, retail, videogames, web, news and debate.
Recorded responses to medical red-teaming prompts and the authors' multi-agent hallucination-detector categories.
Measures audio-visual reasoning through questions linking sounds to events in egocentric videos.
Released distribution-test results for prompt perturbations, model alignment and persona comparisons.
Individual movie-title guesses from four vision-language models, queried with movie frames or their released captions.
Published completion flags and full answer text for seven agent frameworks on the 20-task HealthFlow review subset, with the original EHR inputs and reference reports.
Released WMDP multiple-choice outcomes under prefilling, adversarial-suffix and anti-refusal interventions, with original questions and available answer records.
Released EngiOpt Beams2D demonstration results: conditional GAN and conditional diffusion outputs at three explicit design conditions, with initial, cumulative and final signed optimality gaps.
Multiple-choice questions about aero-engine sensor sequences, paired with the answers in the original ITFormer result export.
Released reasoning trajectories from four models on four task suites, with human faithfulness annotations and parsed-answer correctness.
Molecular property reasoning at the functional-group level. This curation links individual model outputs to the 7,146-question test bank, preserving classification correctness and numeric squared errors.
Released text-to-image generations on 760 prompts covering 27 failure modes, with human annotations for the five original generators.
Original student practice and exam grades from a mathematics tutoring study, with separately annotated standalone GPT-4 answers.
Published HIV question-answering runs and five clinical judge ratings, retaining reference-guided, reference-free and reference-paraphrasing conditions separately.
Evaluates whether models can select a primary-care code for a Brazilian-Portuguese clinical expression from retrieved candidates, or correctly abstain.
Original input images, editing instructions, BAGEL output images and saved judge responses for the 737 single-turn ImgEdit tasks.
Released kernel-generation correctness assessments for the original 250 PyTorch workloads, including baseline, repeated sampling and iterative refinement.
Released image-editing attempts and their individual consistency, instruction-following, quality and knowledge-plausibility ratings.
Released 2024 LiveAoPSBench Olympiad mathematics questions and complete source-reported model correctness matrix.
Published program-level assessments of LLVM control-flow reconstruction, decompilation, summarization and execution reasoning.
Released GPT-4o text-only node-classification attempts on eleven existing text-attributed graph datasets in the LLM-BP study.
Published synthetic survey responses from eight LLMs on 412 EEDI questions and 385 OpinionQA questions. These are simulated human responses, not direct estimates of the LLMs' question-solving ability.
Released attempts against defended LLM email agents in both LLMail-Inject challenge phases. Subjects are target agents, configured by base model, defense and phase. Items combine submitted emails with the released scenario context; the outcome is attack success, which is undesirable for the target agent.
Measures mathematical problem solving through final-answer correctness and criterion-level proof grades.
Released medical QA, lay-summary, EHR prediction and clinical workflow records with exact available assessments and complete native logs.
MedHELM medhallu: per-(model, item) exact_match in {0,1} (1=correct) on 1000 medical hallucination detection: label an answer as hallucinated or faithful. 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
Complete released medical-watermark generations for three models, with cached paired GPT-Judger quality ratings for Meditron and original auxiliary detection statistics.
Released safety assessment records for two RegMeanPlusPlus merged language models, with explicit attribution to WildGuardTest, HarmBench, XSTest and Do Anything Now.
Released per-system observations of machine-learned interatomic potentials across physics-aware simulation tasks.
MMDocRAG tests whether models can answer questions about documents by weaving retrieved text and images into a cited answer, which a judge model rates for fluency, citation quality, coherence, reasoning and factuality.
Original MMOral closed/open dental radiograph tasks and released OPTG voter/ensemble choice records.
Released LongGenBench constraint judgments and generated outputs for KV-cache interventions studied in MorphKV; these are measurements on LongGenBench, not a new task bank.
Released LLM evaluator ratings of medical candidate answers in English and Chinese, with original questions, reference answers and expert annotations.
MTBBench evaluates multimodal LLMs on sequential clinical decision-making in oncology. Two cohorts: HANCOCK (multimodal pathology — TMA images, H&E slides, cell density) and MSK-CHORD (longitudinal genomics — genomic profiles, clinical timelines). Models act as agentic AI physicians, optionally using external tools (DrugBank, CONCH, PubMed). Each case contains multiple multi-choice questions; correctness is binary (matched vs. ground truth).
Released multiple-choice correctness results and ungraded MT-Bench conversations from the Multi-MoE serving study.
Released model responses and original fractional grades on university STEM assessment questions with archived input images.
Recorded answer choices and correctness from the NAEP LLM-as-student study, linked to original NAEP question pages.
The complete released NaturalReasoning subset: synthetic reasoning questions, available extracted references, and recorded Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct answers without correctness grades.
Bilingual visual text recognition, localization, parsing and reasoning with 10,000 released InternVL2.5-26B predictions across 30 task types.
OOD-Prediction correctness dataset (Huang et al., ICML 2025): released prompts for 5 tasks (IOI, PriceTag, RAVEL, MMLU, Unlearn Harry Potter) under in-distribution and OOD settings, each prompt labelled correct/wrong by the target model. subject = target model; item = the prompt; response = 1 correct / 0 wrong.
Released computer-use executions with separately identified safety and task-completion assessments.
Spanish medical multiple-choice questions from Peruvian residency examinations, with released outputs from eleven medical model configurations.
Visual 3D block assembly planning with released model outputs, scene images, candidate blocks and dependency annotations. This import covers the assembly branch, not aggregate paper rows or VQA references without predictions.
ProofAug: cumulative theorem-proving results of deepseek-math-7b-base + ProofAug (mixed prompting strategy, <=2100 queries/problem, Isabelle) on the curated miniF2F-test — a full 244-problem binary solved/unsolved matrix (161 solved, 66.0%).
Released turn-level ratings of delusion confirmation, harm enablement and safety intervention in scripted conversations with eight models.
Recorded next-lesson recommendations from fourteen Pxplore policy configurations, with per-criterion learner-state alignment judgments for fifty released sessions.
REAL tests whether web agents can complete user tasks on deterministic clones of real websites, counting an attempt as successful only when every one of the task's automatic checks passes.
Recorded grading of Olympiad mathematical proofs by reference-aided language-model workflows.
ResearchCodeBench tests whether models can implement a missing piece of a recent machine learning paper's code, given the paper itself and the surrounding file, with curated tests deciding whether the filled in code works.
Reasoning-informed visual editing on 360 temporal, causal, spatial and logical tasks. This import contains 21 author-released model exports and two historical BAGEL configurations, with individual image-completion judgments and separate grading protocols.
Native final suspicion assessments made by monitor models on released SHADE-Arena and CUA-SHADE-Arena agent trajectories.
Recorded human preferences between scientific literature-grounded model responses, with their released questions and retrieved paper banks.
Iterative scientific-discovery trajectories on 137 systems-biology tasks. Agents receive a partial SBML model, design simulated experiments, and submit a reconstructed model. The curated release includes six reaction-recovery metrics derived from final models and explicitly unavailable trajectory-error grades.
Six LLMs predict which of two Food.com recipes has the higher average user rating on 500 author-selected pairs.
Stochastic vehicle routing benchmark. This curation preserves the released individual route exports and their cost, constraint violation, feasibility, runtime, and robustness metrics.
Released SWE-agent run labels and formatted training conversations on synthetic SWE-smith software tasks.
Evaluates coding agents on resolving real repository issues using per-instance test outcomes.
Evaluates coding-agent issue resolution using repository tests.
Individual test-row predictions from eight published TabArena methods, with derived classification correctness or regression squared error.
Measures tool-using customer-service agents in dual-control conversations.
Released 3EED baseline predictions for outdoor language-conditioned 3D grounding, with original image and LiDAR inputs and native box-overlap grades.
Released Turkic-language multiple-choice model attempts with their complete recorded few-shot context, shuffled choices and original answer-extraction protocol.
Released completion outcomes for multi-model teacher–learner conversations grounded in WikiHow tutorials.
Released sentence-level predictions of central-bank monetary-policy stance, time orientation and certainty.
AISafetyLab evaluation of 50 AdvPrompter prompts against Vicuna-7B-v1.5, without a defense and with SafeDecoding. Each released judgment records whether Llama Guard 3 classified the response as unsafe.
Released model responses to multiple-choice medical questions in African healthcare contexts.
Evaluates task utility and attacker-goal success for tool-using agents exposed to prompt injection.
Evaluates interactive coding agents on tasks spanning a simulated collection of applications.
Released language-model answers to bAbI reasoning questions embedded in long distractor passages.
Released API-model responses to parallel English and Basque trivia questions about local Basque culture and global topics.
Published multilingual question-answering results on Winogrande, Belebele and three clinical MMLU sections, with base and fine-tuned models.
Released enzyme-classification and reaction-to-enzyme retrieval predictions from CARE.
Axiomatic Training causal-reasoning evaluation: per-item Yes/No d-separation questions over linear causal chains of length 7-15 (500 items per length), answered by the baseline Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct and its axiomatic-training LoRA finetune. Response is binary (1 = prediction matches the gold Yes/No label).
ClashEval records how six language models answer factual questions with and without altered retrieved context. The import retains each released context-conditioned attempt and one reused closed-book answer per model/question.
Released model generations for complex Chinese instructions with composed grading requirements; historical judgments are unavailable.
Evaluates agents on reproducing scientific code and answering questions about its outputs.
Historical model outputs and keyword-based attack-success grades from CROW development exports.
Recorded execution verdicts and postprocessed generations for input and output prediction on Python functions.
Published processing-time measurements for Data-Juicer 2.0 deduplication, CPU/GPU operators and cloud-scale workloads.
Released BEHAVIOR goal-interpretation answers: full task prompts, symbolic goal references and recorded LLM outputs; historical grades are unavailable.
Original EasyJailbreak attack inputs, model outputs and binary success annotations redistributed with Emoji Attack.
Answer correctness in ERBench's released binary-question CSVs across eight model folders and seven domain/task splits.
Released five-example previews for BIG-Bench Hard evaluations of Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct under eleven zero-shot, few-shot ICL and test-time training interventions. These previews cover 7,425 observations, not the complete evaluation sets used to calculate the accompanying task accuracies.
Released long-term-memory tests for conversational agents, preserving task definitions, scheduling conditions and complete recorded conversations.
Released model generations and native attack-success judgments from the HarmBench text and multimodal playground.
AIR-Bench tests model replies against a taxonomy of risks drawn from government regulations and company policies. This import preserves the published refusal/safety grades, including intermediate values.
HarmBench measures whether a model refuses harmful requests, covering behaviors such as cybercrime, misinformation and chemical or biological harm, with a classifier judging each reply as safe or unsafe. Recorded scores retain intermediate judge ratings; 1 indicates the best rubric score and 0 the worst.
Original LaTeX and music-sheet image-to-code predictions with their recorded multimodal requests and per-metric grades. Each response is one published grading dimension of an attempt, not an independent model generation. Webpage exports redact their stimuli and outputs and remain raw-only.
Per-attempt programming-question grades from the author-released InfiBench evaluation logs, including three human-answer comparators and the historical two-model development release.
Recorded symbolic-trace predictions for LTLRandom35 formulas from two alpha-renaming baseline configurations released with the Interchangeable Token Embeddings paper.
Published Korean multiple-choice predictions from the independently maintained Korean LLM Benchmark Suite, matched to the original KMMLU question bank.
Published Korean healthcare licensing-exam predictions from the independently maintained Korean LLM Benchmark Suite.
Released Chinese legal predictions across 23 tasks and two prompting settings, using native accuracy or ROUGE-L without thresholding.
Released model answers to individual LINGOLY question parts, retaining complete recorded prompts and full-context/no-context conditions.
Published per-question grading events from the LiveBench release history across six task categories.
Released six-option logits for 25 model labels on five adapted multiple-choice datasets, with three prompting strategies and base/chat input formats.
MedHELM medbullets: per-(model, item) exact_match in {0,1} (1=correct) on 308 USMLE Step 2/3-style clinical vignette multiple-choice questions. 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
MedHELM medcalc_bench: per-(model, item) medcalc_bench_accuracy in {0,1} (1=correct) on 1000 clinical calculations from a patient note (risk scores, dosing, lab-derived values). 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
MedHELM medec: per-(model, item) medec_error_flag_accuracy in {0,1} (1=correct) on 597 detecting whether a clinical note contains a medical error (error-flag accuracy). 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
Original released multimodal judge preferences and bias ratings, linked to unchanged MJ-Bench image inputs.
All 300 released MedS-Ins rationale-generation examples on MMedBench: 50 attempts in each of six languages, with full recorded requests, reference explanations and generated outputs. The release has no saved grades.
Released model predictions on multiple-choice questions across fourteen academic domains.
Published per-image-set accuracy estimates for vision models identifying the different object among multiple views.
Released requests, outputs and correctness results for mixture-of-experts models under different serving configurations.
Complete released prompts, model-generated solutions and per-sample correctness flags from the original Monkey Business repeated-sampling collection.
NESTER: dataflow-guided neuro-symbolic type inference for Python. Released per-item data covers the human evaluation of high-level program generation on ManyTypes4Py samples: GPT-4, GPT-4o and GPT-4o mini generations each graded on four binary criteria (correctness, explainability, factuality, consistency) by human annotators. Recovered from deleted xlsx blobs in the authors' GitHub repository.
Published challenge-level flag-recovery assessments from 15 NYU CTF leaderboard submissions, with original challenge inputs and released agent trajectories.
PKU-SafeRLHF per-response safety ratings for Alpaca-family models.
Human ratings and selected-response flags for 21 generating models in PRISM conversations.
ProX (Programming Every Example) pre-training data refinement — released per-item math evals. Coverage is the partial slice the authors released: TinyLlama-1.1B continually pre-trained on the original OpenWebMath corpus, at two intermediate checkpoints (0.5B and 1B training tokens), scored per-item (binary correctness) on the paper's 9-task few-shot CoT math suite (GSM8K, MATH, SVAMP, ASDiv, MAWPS, TabMWP, MathQA, MMLU-STEM, SAT-Math). Per-item files for the ProX-refined CPT counterparts were not released.
University-level Putnam competition math problems; response is a human-graded reasoning rubric (5 ordinal dimensions) on each model solution.
REVOLVE solution-optimization evaluation: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct performs test-time training on GPQA-Diamond (198 items) and MMLU Machine Learning (112 items) multiple-choice questions, optimized either by the TextGrad baseline (v1) or by REVOLVE (v2, response-evolution tracking). Binary exact-match correctness of the extracted answer letter at each optimization stage (initial zero-shot, iterations 1-3, majority-vote final).
Released TRIDENT instruction-rejection observations on the SafeAgentBench task bank. Six system configurations report whether an instruction is blocked or refused; this subset measures system behavior, not embodied task-completion success.
Statistical method and column selection over described tabular datasets. Preserve the released general-analysis answers and qualitative explanatory replies.
Classify six subjective dimensions of earnings-call question/answer pairs against released human labels.
SynthPAI: personal-attribute inference from synthetic Reddit profiles. 294 synthetic author profiles (7823 comments); 18 LLMs infer up to 8 personal attributes (age, sex, location, birthplace, education, occupation, income, relationship status) from comment history. Each model gives a ranked guess list per attribute, graded 0/0.5/1 against human-curated ground truth.
Measures customer-service tool-using agents with simulated users.
Evaluates agents on workplace tasks in a simulated company using task-specific checkpoint scores.
Original VHELM vision-language requests, image inputs, recorded outputs and release-declared task grades.
Visual Riddles: a commonsense and world-knowledge challenge for large vision and language models. Each item is an AI-generated image with an open-ended question requiring visual reasoning plus world knowledge. Per-(model, item) responses are human-rated correct/incorrect on the open-ended task.
Released automatic and human success judgments of multimodal web-agent trajectories on VisualWebArena.
VL-RewardBench: judge VLM accuracy on (image, query, chosen, rejected) preference pairs.
Image-based user requests with model answers and GPT-4o preference judgments against a fixed Claude-3-Sonnet comparison answer.
Published workflow question answers, demonstration judgments, SOP rankings, SOP generation and per-screenshot segmentation outcomes. Original SOPs, action traces and screenshots supply the actual task context.
Human assessments of released GenericAgent trajectories on ServiceNow tasks from WorkArena and WorkArena++.
Released safety judgments of 560 outputs from four language models on 140 red-team prompts.
Recorded human judgments of Minecraft agent videos on four open-ended BASALT tasks.
Published Petavue evaluations of text-to-SQL models on a 360-question BIRD development subset.
Chinese multiple-choice question bank with released item-level option predictions from the Contamination Detector study.
Recorded 2023 GPT-3.5/GPT-4 snapshots across eight tasks, retaining complete outputs and original grading semantics.
Chinese multiple-choice knowledge questions with complete OpenCompass model predictions and a versioned reconstruction of option-extraction accuracy.
Released model outputs from six DecodingTrust perspectives, with complete source context and explicit missing grades.
Do-Not-Answer baseline-refusal benchmark: 939 refusal-worthy prompts asked directly (no adversarial wrapper) of 6 LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Claude, ChatGLM2, Llama-2-7B-chat, Vicuna-7B), with two annotation labels per cell: binary harmfulness and a six-category action label.
Published Anno-GPT relevance judgments and explanations for scientific requirement–abstract pairs.
Published LLoVi question-answering results on the 500-question public EgoSchema subset, retaining the available caption-based inputs and eleven model/prompt configurations.
EVOUNA (QA-Eval): per-(model, question) human correctness judgments for five Open-QA systems (FiD, GPT-3.5/text-davinci-003, ChatGPT, GPT-4, New Bing) answering the same Open-domain questions from Natural Questions (3,610) and TriviaQA (2,000). Each model answer was manually judged correct/incorrect by a human annotator.
Human factuality annotations of 4,426 segments from 847 released ChatGPT answers across five domains.
Released video-generation measurements for four models on 619 prompts, including individual human ratings and five automatic alignment metrics.
Evaluates whether models can answer financial questions about public-company filings across closed-book and context-assisted settings.
Released function-interpretation conversations and available native grades for numeric, string and synthetic-neuron functions.
Human ratings of ChatGPT and GPT-4 answers to natural-language mathematics questions with released prompt text.
Released image-context reasoning outputs from OpenVLMRecords, with original HallusionBench sample outputs preserved separately.
Chinese language evaluation across 21 released task configurations and four model exports. Preserve the declared task metric: item grades where published, and null grades for attempts evaluated only by corpus-level metrics.
SimpleSafetyTests checks whether a model responds safely to blunt requests touching severe harms such as self harm, violence and illegal activity, with a classifier marking each reply safe or unsafe. Recorded scores retain intermediate judge ratings; 1 indicates the best rubric score and 0 the worst.
HELM evaluation on five Thai standardized examination sets: A-Level, IC, ONET, TGAT and TPAT1. Preserve native multiple-choice prompts and exact-match grades.
XSTest checks whether models refuse harmless prompts that merely sound dangerous, pairing them with genuinely unsafe lookalikes so that both excessive caution and unsafe compliance show up. Recorded scores retain intermediate judge ratings; 1 indicates the best rubric score and 0 the worst.
Published 2018–2022 Japanese medical-exam answers from four LLM configurations and a separately identified human-majority-derived comparator.
Released interactive coding episodes in SQL, Bash, Python and capture-the-flag environments, with their original maximum rewards and complete trajectories.
Released Chinese legal-task predictions with complete recorded prompts and deterministic native scoring.
Legal reasoning in five LegalBench tasks evaluated by the 155 released HELM Lite v1.0.0 runs; preserve original per-instance quasi-exact-match grades.
Complete published molecule-level prediction records for the Lo and Hi drug-discovery tasks, with their reference measurements and native aggregate ranking protocol. Individual grades are unavailable.
MathVista testmini visual-mathematical questions with released OpenVLMRecords predictions, cached answer extractions, original images and explicitly derived historical-comparator grades.
MedHELM ehr_sql: per-(model, item) ehr_sql_execution_accuracy in {0,1} (1=correct) on 1000 translating a natural-language clinical question into SQL over an EHR database. 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
MedHELM race_based_med: per-(model, item) exact_match in {0,1} (1=correct) on 167 detecting whether a medical answer relies on harmful race-based reasoning. 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
Recorded candidate-generation rankings from the Mind2Web authors' fine-tuned DeBERTa-v3-base cross-encoder, joined to complete released train and test action-step inputs.
Recorded English MMBench V1.1 answers, original image/question inputs and explicit deterministic per-response grading.
College-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects, with per-question model predictions released by OpenVLMRecords.
Recorded 3D nuclei segmentation quality on six embryonic microscopy volumes.
Original model-generated assistant replies with their released human preference ranks and complete prompt/output records from the OASST1 all-messages export.
Released human process ratings of a fixed GPT-4-derived research generator on MATH problems.
Original ProteinInvBench CATH4.2 and CATH4.3 inverse-folding predictions, matched to the released backbone coordinates and recorded model configurations.
Original QATCH question-answering and semantic-parsing results, with complete table contexts and five distinct recorded grading protocols.
Rakuda Japanese open-ended questions, with Shaberi model answers and separately recorded LLM-judge ratings.
Original topic-classification outputs in 205 languages, with recorded language-specific classifier runs and zero-shot LLM replies.
Original capture-level assessments of 3D object inverse-rendering methods on measured real-world images and geometry.
SugarCrepe: a non-gameable vision-language compositionality benchmark of ~7.5k (image, positive caption, hard-negative caption) triples across 7 hard-negative types (add/replace/swap of attributes, objects, relations). Models must pick the caption that matches the COCO-2017 image. This build ingests the released per-item GPT-4V responses from the official repo (the only model with per-instance outputs released; the 17 CLIP models in the paper have only aggregate accuracy), in two caption-presentation orders (positive-first / negative-first).
Released game records of model access-granting behavior under human-written defense prompts and inputs.
Measures human acceptability of saved instruction-following model responses.
Measures four aspects of released model completions using recorded GPT-4 feedback.
Measures instruction following through original human and GPT-4 judgments, retaining the original visual or caption inputs.
Measures compliance and refusal on safe prompts and unsafe contrasts.
Complete published named-entity tag predictions for African-language test sentences and their historical reference annotations.
Multiple-choice science-diagram questions, with primary per-question model predictions released by OpenVLMRecords and deterministically derived exact-match grades.
Native Aider polyglot results from Parasoft's MISRA prompting study: 5,356 attempts on 26 C++ tasks using seven model labels and sixteen named experimental arms. One GPT-5 arm changes its instruction text between runs, yielding seventeen recorded agent configurations.
ARC Prize's released model attempts on the public evaluation tasks of ARC-AGI-1 and ARC-AGI-2, which test the inference of transformations from example grids.
Recorded language-model attempts on multiple-choice and open-ended atmospheric-science problems.
Multiple-choice questions testing the effects of social biases in ambiguous and disambiguated contexts.
Released decompiler outputs for individual C/C++ functions from HumanEval, MBPP and GitHub2025. Derive the authors' edit-similarity metric deterministically from the original outputs and reference source. This metric measures textual similarity, not executable correctness.
Published model choice scores for lexical mapping, visual vocabulary and grammatical comprehension, with available complete image inputs.
Published blind and test-informed software-agent evaluations on enterprise Java/Spring tasks.
Published expert judgments of generated natural-language queries and associated biomedical visualization specifications.
Released task-utility and attacker-success verdicts for ten agent-framework/model configurations, with complete related native histories.
Published teaching-question answers and adversarial safety judgments for fourteen simulated-teacher model configurations.
Released mathematical word-problem generations and two published automatic quality judgments for eleven generator models.
Engineering-design tasks with released simulation-based pass/fail judgments. The native release includes single-answer trials and iterative refinement chains.
Human judgments before and after advice on five classification tasks, with recorded ResNet-18 advice for the dermatology task.
HELM evaluation of clinical MMLU and Winogrande in 11 African languages, preserving published per-request exact-match grades.
Anthropic Red Team tests whether models avoid complying with adversarial prompts taken from human red teaming conversations, with a safety classifier judging each response as safe or unsafe. Recorded scores retain intermediate judge ratings; 1 indicates the best rubric score and 0 the worst.
BBQ tests whether models pick the correct answer to multiple choice questions about people from different social groups, asking each question once with too little context to answer it and once with the context that settles it.
BOLD measures biases in open-ended language generation. This import preserves HELM's published fraction of toxic completions for each request, with lower values indicating less toxicity.
RealToxicityPrompts measures how often a model continues a sentence fragment with text a toxicity classifier flags as toxic, using prompts drawn from both toxic and innocuous starting text.
Released Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct answers on all 400 questions of the 119th Japanese Medical Licensing Examination, with original explanations and source image resources.
Native forced-choice and response-set judgments from nine LLM raters on eleven published tasks, with complete prompt and input-order associations.
Olympiad inequality problems expressed as bound estimation or relation prediction. This release preserves 1000 distinct GPT-4o-mini example outputs across four prompt conditions, with individual grades unavailable.
Released final target-model outputs under five jailbreak methods, with primary and available historical judge decisions kept as separate grading protocols.
Original scored generator responses released by JETTS across eight math, code and instruction-following component datasets.
Released evaluations of seven named LLM judges on 3000 LMSys paired-answer comparisons.
Released final-checkpoint NetHack episode outcomes for 572 independently trained offline-RL policies across 38 character-configuration tasks.
MedHELM head_qa: per-(model, item) exact_match in {0,1} (1=correct) on 1000 Spanish healthcare specialization (MIR/medicine/pharmacy/nursing) exam questions. 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
MedHELM med_mcqa: per-(model, item) exact_match in {0,1} (1=correct) on 1000 Indian medical-entrance (AIIMS/NEET-PG) multiple-choice questions. 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
MedHELM med_qa: per-(model, item) exact_match in {0,1} (1=correct) on 1000 US medical licensing exam (USMLE) multiple-choice clinical questions. 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
MedHELM pubmed_qa: per-(model, item) exact_match in {0,1} (1=correct) on 1000 biomedical research questions answered yes/no/maybe over PubMed abstracts. 13 models from the MedHELM v4.0.0 release.
Released idea-generation and research-proposal reviews for 201 ML research tasks, six generator models and two LLM reviewers. Each observation is one rubric dimension of a released review.
Measures academic and professional knowledge through multiple-choice likelihood scoring.
Released site-level predictions for the m6A and m5C RNA-modification tasks, with the original reference assays and aggregate evaluation protocol.
Measures whether language models produce valid plans in classical planning domains.
Recorded code-agent example from the RADAR benchmark for reasoning over imperfect tables.
Per-stimulus click-distribution measurements for 16 released clickability algorithms and variants across five image datasets. Retain original images, object masks, previous segmentation masks and human click references.
Released weekly news-question predictions in multiple-choice and free-text generation settings.
Individual completions and their original algorithmic rewards from the released easy and hard zero-shot experiments. Retain repeated attempts, partial credit and complete prompts and outputs.
Human assessments of model-generated CNN/DailyMail summaries along four quality dimensions.
Measures truthfulness by the likelihood assigned to correct and misleading answers.
Published expert translation-error annotations represented by the existing six-category, three-severity binary readout.
Coverage and timelines use the full data bank. The score heatmap follows benchmark type, not the current search or filters.
Providers ranked by the distinct benchmark items evaluated for their most-measured AI subject.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B
OpenAI
GPT-3.5
Mistral
Mistral 7B
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Microsoft
Phi-3 Medium
DeepSeek
V3
Stanford
Alpaca 7B
Alibaba
Qwen2.5 72B
Cohere
Command R
TII
Falcon 40B
LMSYS
Vicuna 33B
Domains ranked by evaluated items. Multi-domain benchmarks count toward every applicable domain, so totals overlap.
Reasoning
76 benchmarks
Mathematics
30 benchmarks
Safety
42 benchmarks
Science
25 benchmarks
General
49 benchmarks
Reward Modeling
4 benchmarks
Multilingual
17 benchmarks
Knowledge
21 benchmarks
ML Engineering
7 benchmarks
Preference
10 benchmarks
Law
5 benchmarks
Agents & Tool Use
29 benchmarks
Cybersecurity
4 benchmarks
NLP Tasks
6 benchmarks
Medicine
35 benchmarks
Finance
6 benchmarks
Software Engineering
24 benchmarks
Education
14 benchmarks
Cultural
2 benchmarks
Month-dated benchmarks, stacked by release month and colored by primary domain.
Showing recent releases. Swipe for earlier years.
Not shown (no month-dated release): Aider C++ prompting study, AtmosSci-Bench, Decompile-Bench: released IDA and Ghidra outputs, DevBench, DPAI Arena, DQVis expert-reviewed generations, DTap-Bench, EduGuardBench, EDUMATH, EngDesign, HELM African MMLU + Winogrande, IgakuQA119, Indeterminacy Experiments, IneqMath, JailbreakBench, JETTS generator response pool, JudgeTuning LMSys human agreement, Katakomba, MLR-Bench, NanoBaseLib RNA Modification Detection, RADAR, RClicks: released clickability-model measurements, Reasoning Gym: original zero-shot completions, Tengu-Bench.
Dated AI subjects evaluated in the data bank, stacked by release month and colored by provider.
Showing recent releases. Swipe for earlier years.
103 AI subjects with no recorded release date are not shown.
Mean binary score for each AI subject and domain. Multi-domain benchmarks contribute to every applicable column; hatching means no qualifying measurement.
Swipe sideways for more domains.
Analysis package
A PyTorch-native toolkit for predictive evaluation of AI systems. The Data Bank supplies curated item-level evidence; torch_measure works downstream on compatible subject-by-item data for modeling and diagnostics.
import torch
from torch_measure.models import Rasch
# Binary AI systems × items; NaN marks a missing response.
responses = torch.tensor(
[
[1, 0, 1, float("nan")],
[0, 1, 1, 0],
[1, 1, float("nan"), 1],
],
dtype=torch.float32,
)
model = Rasch(
n_subjects=responses.shape[0],
n_items=responses.shape[1],
)
model.fit(responses, max_epochs=500, verbose=False)
print(model.ability.detach())
print(model.difficulty.detach())This Rasch example is for binary responses. When preparing a compatible tensor from the Data Bank, retain the selected benchmark, trial, and test-condition context alongside it.
A subject is the complete configuration of an AI system under evaluation: the base model (typically a large language model) together with the setting that alters its behavior, including its access date, harness name, harness version, and reasoning effort. Anthropic's Demystifying evals for AI agents defines a harness (which is also called scaffold) as "the system that enables a model to act as an agent: it processes inputs, orchestrates tool calls, and returns results." Two evaluations of the same base model under different configurations (e.g., the same base model with two harnesses) can behave quite differently, constituting two different subjects.
An item (i.e., a question or a task) comprises the complete stimulus presented to the subject and its grading protocol. The stimulus includes the underlying prompt, attachments, and item features that alter its presentation (such as few-shot examples or prompt phrasing). The grading protocol comprises the grading criterion (reference answer, rule, or both) and the verifier that applies it. The same stimulus evaluated under different grading protocols has distinct item IDs; its text-only content_hash remains available for finding shared prompt text.
An interactor is any party other than the subject that participates in producing a response, such as the attacker probing the subject in an adversarial evaluation, the simulated user or human user the agent converses with, or the opponent subject in a pairwise comparison.
A test condition records a setting of the measurement occasion that varied while the model and the prompt content were held fixed, including the sampling temperature. The test condition is null when all information about the experiment is captured in other fields. We expect most information of the experiment to be documented in specific fields, and test conditions should be null most of the time.
A response is the grade of a trace for tuples of (subject, item, trial, interactor, test condition), typically on a ordinal scale with a small, finite set of categories. The typical case in AI evaluation is binary (with 1 represents correct or success, and 0 otherwise), but there is also the case where we have Likert scales. Continuous responses for the tuple (subject, item, trial, integrator, test condition) are empiricially rare, especially for frontier subjects.
Each benchmark should have one folder called benchmarks/{dataset}/. The most important file in this folder is build.py, which is responsible for downloading the raw upstream data and adapt it to the data schema above. The downloaded data is stored in the raw/ and, in some cases, the docker/ folder. For a given upstream data source, the data curation done by the file build.py should be completely reproducible and well-documented. The build.py file relies on the metadata.yaml file, stored in the same directory, to provide metadata about the benchmark. The metadata.yaml together with shared dataset validation and benchmark-specific source checks under tests/benchmarks/, with reviewed expectations in characterization.yaml ensure the quality of the curation process.
The metadata.yaml file contains the declarative benchmark facts, such as benchmark name, expected number of item from benchmark technical report, expected number of subject, and trace coverage, as well as provider-owned source URLs and paper references. To see a complete list of fields and their descriptions in a metadata.yaml file, see benchmark_metadata_schema.yaml. We avoid duplicate data stored in this YAML file in other files to avoid drift. For the template of a file build.py, please see benchmarks/_template/build.py, which can be helpful when starting a new benchmark. Each build.py file is intentionally writen in a way that is readable and maintainable. The quality of the metadata.yaml file and characteristic test files are ensure by human reviewers.
A build.py file should generate at least 4 tables, saved as parquet files. For a complete schema of the table with detailed descriptions, please see parquet_schemas.yaml. These files are:
The file items.parquet lists the benchmark's items. Each row includes the exact item used to evaluate the subject and its required grading_criterion and verifier. The criterion is a JSON object with reference_answer and rule fields: each is a nonempty string or null, and at least one must be supplied. The verifier describes the grader or implementation that applies the criterion. Both contribute to item identity, together with the effective response scale inherited from the benchmark or specified in a mixed-scale criterion. Uniform scales are not duplicated in item records. Neither grading field is repeated in responses.parquet.
The file subjects.parquet lists the AI subjects the benchmark evaluated.
The file benchmarks.parquet is a single row of metadata about the benchmark itself. Its upstream data link is source_url. The derived has_reference_answer flag is true if any item has a reference answer; items graded solely by rules do not set this flag.
The file responses.parquet is a long-form table with one row per (subject, item, trial, test condition, interactors) tuple.
The optional file traces.parquet holds available interaction traces, with zero or one trace per response. Join it to responses.parquet on response_id; repeated attempts have distinct response IDs. The response table does not contain a trace placeholder. The trace file is omitted when no traces are available.
The file assets.parquet contains any additional assets needed for the benchmark, such as images or other files.
The scripts/build_measurement_tables/ folder holds shared Python helpers for registering subjects and items, deriving IDs, and validating and writing tables.
Citation
If you use the data we curated, please cite the following reference. The curation is released under CC BY-SA 4.0; individual benchmarks retain their upstream licenses.
@misc{measurementdb2026, title = {The AI Measurement Data Bank}, author = {Truong, Nhi and Truong, Sang T. and Koyejo, Sanmi}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://aimslab.stanford.edu/measurement-db}}, note = {AIMS Lab, Stanford University}}